Right people… I’m not yet cleared to come back to school. I’m going to try and speak to my consultant at PRI to get his advice, but that my take a couple of days so we’re looking at Wednesday as the best case scenario. In the meantime, I’ll need to do lots via the blog and Edmodo thanks to left handed typing and SIRI (I may even attempt to hold a pencil in my mouth as well!).
First things first, those doing Nat 5 have the first submission date on your project/assignment. This means you have to get a move on… You are welcome to come up to my room at all ours to use the PCs if necessary, just let Miss Daly know why you are in.
Second, the difference between the Nat 5 and Higher is as follows:
Pre-production phase (i.e., before you actually make your poster(s)) is petty much the same process. EVERYONE should be working on this!
Development (N5) / Development and Evaluation (H)
The main difference comes after you’ve made your poster(s)… and I’ll post more on this tomorrow, but for now let’s concentrate on Pre-Production.
Here are a series of questions for you to attempt. 5 Marks available for each as follows…
- Describe what you discovered during your research into Audience, and explain how this influenced your plans.
- Describe what you discovered during your research into Internal Institutional controls, and explain how this influenced your plans.
- Describe what you discovered during your research into External Institutional controls, and explain how this influenced your plans.
- Describe what you discovered during your research into categories, language, narrative, representation*, and explain how this influenced your plans.
- Describe what you discovered during your research into categories, language, narrative, representation*, and explain how this influenced your plans. (Yes, it’s the same as 4… but you’ve to do it again for a different area of research)
Points/marks are awarded as follows:
You need to describe what you found, the explain how this is likely to influence your planning.
There is 1 mark for a relevant point, followed by more marks for development of the point. The key thing is that (to quote the SQA), “Candidates may provide a number of straightforward points or a smaller number of developed points, or a combination of these.” Or in normal words, the more points and the fuller the explanations you make for each of the 5 questions, the more likely you are to get full marks…
Here’s a wee example from the SQA to show you how this works in practice:
Example: In my research into external controls I found out through the Advertising Standards Authority that children should not be made to feel unpopular for not buying a product that is advertised to them. (1 mark for description of research) This affected my plan to show one boy getting more friends than another because he had the game I was advertising. (1 mark for effect on planning) I decided to alter the narrative to show them all having fun with the game at the end so that it was the game that was represented positively, as well as both boys, not just one. (1 mark for development)
That answer would have given you 3/5. Give a second example, and you are well own your way to 5/5.
GET ON WITH IT!
Finally, for now, the questions are up on Edmodo (Group code: sybis5) Or you can upload them/email them. I’ll be monitoring Edmodo and the Blog during the double period so will try my best to help.
PS: Don’t forget the last post on ASA and CAP.